The New Zealand Education Review Office in
2012 identified three areas that schools need to address to promote good
practice and help priority learners achieve at a recognised National level:
1. Shifting the focus to student centred
learning
2. Knowledgeably implementing a
responsive and rich curriculum
3. Using assessment information to know
about, and plan for students' learning
The topic
which resonates most for me is based around assessments and how we conduct them,
analyse them and use that information. The three recommendations are
interlinked but I would argue that a clear understanding of assessment needs to
occur before delivering a rich curriculum with students at the heart of their
learning.
ERO
identified that only 17 percent of Primary schools collected, analysed and used
achievement data well, including using it to set appropriate targets for improved
Maori student achievement. This is a shockingly low percentage. Priority
learners need teachers who understand how to assess both summatively and
formatively, can analyse the data to determine a child’s strengths and then
find innovative ways to provide a rich curriculum to fill the gaps.
I have
been teaching for longer than I care to admit but for oh so many years I believed
I knew what assessment was all about. I capably administered SATs tests in the
UK to 7 year olds who had previously been given group and individualized learning
opportunities with hands on, fun stuff. All that was halted at SATs time and
children were sat in rows to complete papers in silence. This was total
anathema to me.
Even in
New Zealand assessments were viewed by myself and colleagues as a necessity at
the end of a task to test whether what you had taught had sunk in. I was really
successful at administering standardized tests, marking them, entering the data
for school reporting and then filing the paperwork away. What a waste of time
and added stress for my students.
I do
believe there is a place for Standardised tests as long as what we are
assessing is used to inform curriculum choices and to create opportunities for
student centred learning. The National Intelligence Council Global Trends reports that:
individual
empowerment will accelerate owing to poverty reduction, growth of the global middle class, greater educational
attainment, widespread use of new communications and manufacturing technologies, and health-care advances. (NIC, 2012, p.ii). Greater educational attainment
through student centred learning and an increase in student agency have never
been more crucial.
Assessing pupils both formally and informally should form
the basis for what we are teaching and why. Working alongside pupils to
highlight strengths and set personal goals with clear steps on how to get there
is critical if we are to empower individuals to achieve. The expected learning
students should make both in Achievement and development should be clearly
understood. A child’s prior knowledge should be explored and previous progress noted
before planning student centred learning. The gaps between expectations, prior
learning and achievement need to be clear so pupils understand the learning
they need to make. To ensure assessment is relevant for our students we must build
on their interests, strengths and learning needs. Curriculum delivery also
needs to align with culturally responsive practices.
I fear I never saw testing as being crucial for my
understanding of student’s needs or gaps in knowledge or skills. I certainly
never saw analyzing a test as best practice to inform my planning and sharing
that data with a child was not what a test was designed for. I have my own
views on National Standard expectations which could be discussed at length. They
appear to be here to stay and if assessing students means we have clear
expectations for their learning, share targets, devise clear steps to get there
to empower our learners and also celebrate successes then that is clearly
better than filing away test papers.
References
National Intelligence Council. (2012). Global
trends: Alternative Worlds. National Intelligence Council: US. Retrieved from
https://globaltrends2030.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/global-trends-2030-november2012.pdf
Education Review Office. (2012). Evaluation at
a Glance: Priority Learners in New Zealand Schools. Retrieved 18 May 2016, fromhttp://www.ero.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Evaluation-at-a-Glance-Priority-Learners-in-New-Zealand-Schools-August-2012.pdf
These thoughts and ideas about assessment can not only be local or general to teachers in your area Emma. I wonder then if it is the tools and the systems in place that guide teacher's use and understanding of assessment rather than our ideas of it driving the tools. It is therefore interesting that NZEI campaigned for teachers to have more release time. I mean if we are not assessing properly at the moment surely having more time out of class to assess would not improve the situation but maintain or exacerbate the status quo. I wonder if their intentions were not so soundly thought out?
ReplyDelete